0.10/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.13	% Command    : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TAtMJHwkBp true
0.13/0.33	% Computer   : n007.cluster.edu
0.13/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 13:57:19 EDT 2021
0.13/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.33	% Running portfolio for 120 s
0.13/0.33	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.13/0.33	% Number of cores: 8
0.13/0.33	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.13/0.33	% Running in HO mode
0.46/0.63	% Total configuration time : 828
0.46/0.63	% Estimated wc time : 983
0.46/0.63	% Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 122.875
0.51/0.70	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 47s
0.51/0.70	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 47s
0.51/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 47s
0.51/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 41s
0.51/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 53s
0.51/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 18s
0.51/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 35s
0.51/0.73	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 24s
0.53/0.77	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 53s
16.10/2.69	% Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh.
16.10/2.69	% running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TAtMJHwkBp/e_inputdeec74 --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p
16.10/2.69	% done 24 iterations in 1.932s
16.10/2.69	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
16.10/2.69	% SZS output start Refutation
16.10/2.69	thf(term_type, type, term: $tType).
16.10/2.69	thf(subst_type, type, subst: $tType).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_lem0_type, type, pushprop_lem0: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(var_type, type, var: term > $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(sh_type, type, sh: subst).
16.10/2.69	thf(sub_type, type, sub: term > subst > term).
16.10/2.69	thf(push_type, type, push: term > subst > subst).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_p_and_p_prime_type, type, pushprop_p_and_p_prime: term > 
16.10/2.69	                                                               subst > 
16.10/2.69	                                                               (term > $o) > 
16.10/2.69	                                                               (term > $o) > $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_lthm_type, type, pushprop_lthm: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_type, type, pushprop: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(one_type, type, one: term).
16.10/2.69	thf(axshiftcons_type, type, axshiftcons: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(comp_type, type, comp: subst > subst > subst).
16.10/2.69	thf(ulamvar1_type, type, ulamvar1: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(axclos_type, type, axclos: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(axvarcons_type, type, axvarcons: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(ulamvarind_type, type, ulamvarind: $o).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_lthm, axiom, pushprop_lthm =
16.10/2.69	  (( pushprop_lem0 ) =>
16.10/2.69	   ( ( ulamvar1 ) =>
16.10/2.69	     ( ( axvarcons ) =>
16.10/2.69	       ( ( axclos ) =>
16.10/2.69	         ( ( axshiftcons ) => ( ( ulamvarind ) => ( pushprop ) ) ) ) ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('0', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( pushprop_lthm ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ( pushprop_lem0 ) =>
16.10/2.69	       ( ( ulamvar1 ) =>
16.10/2.69	         ( ( axvarcons ) =>
16.10/2.69	           ( ( axclos ) =>
16.10/2.69	             ( ( axshiftcons ) => ( ( ulamvarind ) => ( pushprop ) ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop, axiom, pushprop =
16.10/2.69	  (![P:( term > $o ),A:term,M:subst]:
16.10/2.69	   ( ( ![B:term]: ( ( var @ B ) => ( P @ ( sub @ B @ M ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	     ( ( P @ A ) =>
16.10/2.69	       ( ![B:term]: ( ( var @ B ) => ( P @ ( sub @ B @ ( push @ A @ M ) ) ) ) ) ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('1', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( pushprop ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:( term > $o ),X6:term,X8:subst]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ( ![X10:term]: ( ( var @ X10 ) => ( X4 @ ( sub @ X10 @ X8 ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	         ( ( X4 @ X6 ) =>
16.10/2.69	           ( ![X12:term]:
16.10/2.69	             ( ( var @ X12 ) => ( X4 @ ( sub @ X12 @ ( push @ X6 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_lem0, axiom, pushprop_lem0 =
16.10/2.69	  (![P:( term > $o ),A:term,M:subst]:
16.10/2.69	   ( ?[Q:( term > $o )]: ( pushprop_p_and_p_prime @ A @ M @ P @ Q ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('2', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( pushprop_lem0 ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:( term > $o ),X6:term,X8:subst]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ?[X10:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	         ( pushprop_p_and_p_prime @ X6 @ X8 @ X4 @ X10 ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(pushprop_p_and_p_prime, axiom,(( pushprop_p_and_p_prime  ) =
16.10/2.69	  (^[A:term,M:subst,P:( term > $o ),Q:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	   ( ![X:term]: ( ( Q @ X ) <=> ( P @ ( sub @ X @ ( push @ A @ M ) ) ) ) )))).
16.10/2.69	thf('3', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( pushprop_p_and_p_prime ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ^[A:term,M:subst,P:( term > $o ),Q:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ![X:term]: ( ( Q @ X ) <=> ( P @ ( sub @ X @ ( push @ A @ M ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [pushprop_p_and_p_prime])).
16.10/2.69	thf('4', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( pushprop_p_and_p_prime ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ^[V_1:term,V_2:subst,V_3:( term > $o ),V_4:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ![X4:term]:
16.10/2.69	         ( ( V_4 @ X4 ) <=> ( V_3 @ ( sub @ X4 @ ( push @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(ulamvarind, axiom, ulamvarind =
16.10/2.69	  (![P:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	   ( ( P @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	     ( ( ![A:term]:
16.10/2.69	         ( ( var @ A ) => ( ( P @ A ) => ( P @ ( sub @ A @ sh ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	       ( ![A:term]: ( ( var @ A ) => ( P @ A ) ) ) ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('5', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( ulamvarind ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ( X4 @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	         ( ( ![X6:term]:
16.10/2.69	             ( ( var @ X6 ) => ( ( X4 @ X6 ) => ( X4 @ ( sub @ X6 @ sh ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	           ( ![X8:term]: ( ( var @ X8 ) => ( X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(ulamvar1, axiom,(( ulamvar1  ) = (var @ one))).
16.10/2.69	thf('6', plain, (( ulamvar1 ) = ( var @ one )),
16.10/2.69	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [ulamvar1])).
16.10/2.69	thf('7', plain, (( ulamvar1 ) = ( var @ one )), define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(axshiftcons, axiom, axshiftcons =
16.10/2.69	  (![A:term,M:subst]: ( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ A @ M ) ) = ( M ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('8', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( axshiftcons ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:term,X6:subst]: ( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X4 @ X6 ) ) = ( X6 ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(axclos, axiom, axclos =
16.10/2.69	  (![A:term,M:subst,N:subst]:
16.10/2.69	   ( ( sub @ ( sub @ A @ M ) @ N ) = ( sub @ A @ ( comp @ M @ N ) ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('9', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( axclos ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:term,X6:subst,X8:subst]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ( sub @ ( sub @ X4 @ X6 ) @ X8 ) = ( sub @ X4 @ ( comp @ X6 @ X8 ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).
16.10/2.69	thf(axvarcons, axiom, axvarcons =
16.10/2.69	  (![A:term,M:subst]: ( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ A @ M ) ) = ( A ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf('10', plain,
16.10/2.69	    (( axvarcons ) =
16.10/2.69	     ( ![X4:term,X6:subst]: ( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X4 @ X6 ) ) = ( X4 ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	    define([status(thm)])).thf(thm, conjecture, (pushprop_lthm)).
16.10/2.69	thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture,
16.10/2.69	  (( ![X4:( term > $o ),X6:term,X8:subst]:
16.10/2.69	     ( ?[X10:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	       ( ![X12:term]:
16.10/2.69	         ( ( X10 @ X12 ) <=> ( X4 @ ( sub @ X12 @ ( push @ X6 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	   ( ( var @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	     ( ( ![X14:term,X16:subst]:
16.10/2.69	         ( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X14 @ X16 ) ) = ( X14 ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	       ( ( ![X18:term,X20:subst,X22:subst]:
16.10/2.69	           ( ( sub @ ( sub @ X18 @ X20 ) @ X22 ) =
16.10/2.69	             ( sub @ X18 @ ( comp @ X20 @ X22 ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	         ( ( ![X24:term,X26:subst]:
16.10/2.69	             ( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X24 @ X26 ) ) = ( X26 ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	           ( ( ![X28:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	               ( ( X28 @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	                 ( ( ![X30:term]:
16.10/2.69	                     ( ( var @ X30 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                       ( ( X28 @ X30 ) => ( X28 @ ( sub @ X30 @ sh ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	                   ( ![X32:term]: ( ( var @ X32 ) => ( X28 @ X32 ) ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	             ( ![X34:( term > $o ),X36:term,X38:subst]:
16.10/2.69	               ( ( ![X40:term]:
16.10/2.69	                   ( ( var @ X40 ) => ( X34 @ ( sub @ X40 @ X38 ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	                 ( ( X34 @ X36 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                   ( ![X42:term]:
16.10/2.69	                     ( ( var @ X42 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                       ( X34 @ ( sub @ X42 @ ( push @ X36 @ X38 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))).
16.10/2.69	thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
16.10/2.69	  (~( ( ![X4:( term > $o ),X6:term,X8:subst]:
16.10/2.69	        ( ?[X10:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	          ( ![X12:term]:
16.10/2.69	            ( ( X10 @ X12 ) <=> ( X4 @ ( sub @ X12 @ ( push @ X6 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	      ( ( var @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	        ( ( ![X14:term,X16:subst]:
16.10/2.69	            ( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X14 @ X16 ) ) = ( X14 ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	          ( ( ![X18:term,X20:subst,X22:subst]:
16.10/2.69	              ( ( sub @ ( sub @ X18 @ X20 ) @ X22 ) =
16.10/2.69	                ( sub @ X18 @ ( comp @ X20 @ X22 ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	            ( ( ![X24:term,X26:subst]:
16.10/2.69	                ( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X24 @ X26 ) ) = ( X26 ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	              ( ( ![X28:( term > $o )]:
16.10/2.69	                  ( ( X28 @ one ) =>
16.10/2.69	                    ( ( ![X30:term]:
16.10/2.69	                        ( ( var @ X30 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                          ( ( X28 @ X30 ) => ( X28 @ ( sub @ X30 @ sh ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	                      ( ![X32:term]: ( ( var @ X32 ) => ( X28 @ X32 ) ) ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	                ( ![X34:( term > $o ),X36:term,X38:subst]:
16.10/2.69	                  ( ( ![X40:term]:
16.10/2.69	                      ( ( var @ X40 ) => ( X34 @ ( sub @ X40 @ X38 ) ) ) ) =>
16.10/2.69	                    ( ( X34 @ X36 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                      ( ![X42:term]:
16.10/2.69	                        ( ( var @ X42 ) =>
16.10/2.69	                          ( X34 @ ( sub @ X42 @ ( push @ X36 @ X38 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )),
16.10/2.69	  inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
16.10/2.69	thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
16.10/2.69	    (~ (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term > $o]:
16.10/2.69	                     (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                             (((??) @ (^[Y3 : term > $o]:
16.10/2.69	                                                         (((!!) @ (^[Y4 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                                                    ((
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (Y3 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    Y4) <=>
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (Y0 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (
16.10/2.69	                                                                    sub @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    Y4 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (
16.10/2.69	                                                                    push @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    Y1 @ Y2)))))))))))))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	         (((var @ one) =>
16.10/2.69	           (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                         (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                     (((sub @ one @ (push @ Y0 @ Y1)) = (Y0))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	             (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                           (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                       (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                                   (((sub @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                     (sub @ Y0 @ Y1) @ Y2) =
16.10/2.69	                                                     (sub @ Y0 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                     (comp @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	               (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                             (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                         (((comp @ sh @ (push @ Y0 @ Y1)) =
16.10/2.69	                                           (Y1))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	                 (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term > $o]:
16.10/2.69	                               (((Y0 @ one) =>
16.10/2.69	                                 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                               (((var @ Y1) =>
16.10/2.69	                                                 (((Y0 @ Y1) => (Y0 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                   (sub @ Y1 @ sh))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	                                   (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                               (((var @ Y1) => (Y0 @ Y1))))))))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	                   (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term > $o]:
16.10/2.69	                               (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                           (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : subst]:
16.10/2.69	                                                       (((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                                                    ((
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (var @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    Y3) =>
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (Y0 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    (
16.10/2.69	                                                                    sub @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                    Y3 @ Y2))))))) =>
16.10/2.69	                                                         (((Y0 @ Y1) =>
16.10/2.69	                                                           (((!!) @ (
16.10/2.69	                                                             ^[Y3 : term]:
16.10/2.69	                                                               (((var @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                 Y3) =>
16.10/2.69	                                                                 (Y0 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                 (sub @ Y3 @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                  (push @ 
16.10/2.69	                                                                   Y1 @ Y2)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))),
16.10/2.69	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
16.10/2.69	thf(zip_derived_cl1867, plain, ($false),
16.10/2.69	    inference('eprover', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
16.10/2.69	
16.10/2.69	% SZS output end Refutation
16.10/2.69	
16.10/2.69	
16.10/2.69	% Terminating...
16.10/2.75	% Runner terminated.
16.10/2.76	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
16.10/2.77	EOF